[MGSA-L] Fw: Statement of Protest (and the facts)

DIMITRAS PANAGIOTIS helsinki at otenet.gr
Sat Aug 12 08:35:19 PDT 2017

Since this topic has reached this academic list, may I point out that 
despite public calls (eg. Richardos Someritis on Facebook) the exact 
reasoning of the judgment against the ARB has NEVER been published; 
hence NOONE can say with certainty why the court ruled that way (though 
most likely in a way abusive of ECtHR case law). One wonders why 
Vasilakis, Kanellis and Pappas have not published the reasoning if not 
the whole judgment (as for example the "Richter trials" judgment has 
been published).

Panayote Dimitras
>    1. Re: Fw: Statement of Protest (and the facts) (Spiros Moschonas)
>    2. Re: Fw: Statement of Protest (and the facts) (akis at sfr.be)
>    3. Re: Fw: Statement of Protest (and the facts) (DANIEL P. Tompkins)
> concerning the "facts":
> first, I think nobody asked anybody to sign the letter of protest; it
> is signed as it is
> second, it was not claimed that Kotzias studied "with Honecker's
> money"; it was claimed that Kotzias studied with the party's money in
> Honecker's Germany; and no insinuation was made that Kotzias was a
> Stasi agent; it was claimed instead that he participated in a book
> edited by Manfred Buhr, "επικεφαλής του
> Ιδεολογικού Αγώνα του Κομμουνιστικού
> Κόμματος της Ανατολικής Γερμανίας
> (και πράκτορα της Στάζι με το
> ψευδώνυμο Ελαφοπόδαρος"; all in support of the
> major claim that he was a stalinist, which Kotzias has not rejected
> and, last but not least, keep in mind that most of these were claims
> in a letter to the editor of the ARB, not in an "ARB story"; an answer
> to the letter would have been sufficient
> S.
> -------------------------
>  FROM: "akis at sfr.be" <akis at sfr.be>
>  TO: rolandmo at pacbell.net; MGSA List <mgsa-l at uci.edu>
>  SENT: Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:56 PM
>  SUBJECT: Re: [MGSA-L] Fw: Statement of Protest
> The facts of the case against the ARB may be "well known", but not all
> of them are mentioned in this letter of protest. So in order for
> anybody wishing to sign to be able to ponder all the pros and cons, I
> think it would be useful to mention some additional facts.
> The object of the trial was not the cold war, nor the content of the
> convictions held by Kotzias -or anybody else- 30 years ago, or now.
> It was the statements of facts, contained in the ARB story, that
> Kotzias was a "Gauleiter" [term designing a Nazi official] and that he
> had studied in East Germany "with Honecker's money". Insinuations were
> also made that he was a Stasi agent.
> These claims were found inaccurate and libelling by the Greek court.
> This may or may not be sufficient justification for the decision. But
> I don't think it is useful to politicize the issue in such an explicit
> manner. Political views can be credited or discredited according to
> history's ups and downs. The persons who hold them, or held them in
> the past, must have the right to a fair trial, and to object any non
> true statements made against them.
> ---- Message d'origine ----
>  De : Roland Moore <rolandmo at pacbell.net>
>  À : MGSA List <mgsa-l at uci.edu>
>  Objet : [MGSA-L] Fw: Statement of Protest
>  Date : 09/08/2017 20:46:40 CEST
> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 10:55 AM, John O. Iatrides
> <joiatrides at earthlink.net> wrote:
>  I would appreciate it very much if you could post the attached
> statement on the MGSA List.

More information about the MGSA-L mailing list