From Terminator To Deregulator
Friday, 10 October 2003, =
11:45=20
am
Schwarzenegger=92s First Role As Governor-Elect of =
California:
The=20
Deregulator
By Jason Leopold
Forget about the Terminator, =
Arnold=20
Schwarzenegger is taking on
a new role as Governor-elect of =
California: The=20
Deregulator.
One of Schwarzenegger=92s first political moves as =
the state=92s=20
chief
executive will be an effort to push the state=92s electricity=20
market
closer toward deregulation, a move halted by Gov. Gray =
Davis
two=20
years ago in the wake of California=92s energy =
crisis.
Schwarzenegger, while on=20
the campaign trail, blamed Davis for
his handling of the energy=20
crisis.
Schwarzennegger drafted a comprehensive energy policy,=20
which
can be found at (
http://www.joinarnold.co=
m/en/agenda/#C1=20
)
that went unnoticed for much of his campaign during the =
recall
election.=20
He said he wants to eliminate public oversight on future
power supply =
contracts the state signs with energy companies
and adopt a design =
plan for=20
deregulating California=92s electricity
market from other states that =
restructured its electricity markets,
such as Texas, New Jersey and=20
Maryland.
"As governor, I will create a working wholesale power=20
market
based on the lessons learned from other states and the=20
(Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission) standard market=20
design,"
Schwarzenegger said on his campaign website. "California is=20
one
of several states that adopted electricity restructuring.=20
However,
only California's restructuring caused severe price hikes=20
and
energy shortages. It is time to learn from other=20
successful
restructurings enacted by Texas, the New England states,=20
and
the Mid-Atlantic States of Pennsylvania, New Jersey =
and
Maryland. In=20
addition, California should also look to the standard
market design =
created=20
by FERC."
That could be Schwarzenegger=92s first disastrous move=20
as
governor and it may cost him dearly. Here=92s why.
In =
August, the=20
General Accounting Office issued a report
criticizing FERC, the =
nation=92s top=20
watchdog for electricity and
natural gas markets, because the agency =
doesn=92t=20
have the power
to protect consumers from the side effects of =
deregulation,=20
such
as soaring electricity and natural gas prices, which ended =
up
costing=20
California more than $70 billion and bankrupted the
state=92s largest =
utility,=20
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., =
the senior=20
Democrat on the
Senate Governmental Affairs Committee and a contender =
for=20
the
Democratic presidential nomination, said the report =
was
disturbing in=20
the wake of this month's massive electricity
blackout, past =
electricity woes=20
in California and the West, and the
Enron scandal.
"Another =
year has=20
gone by and FERC is still not capable of
effectively protecting =
consumers,"=20
Lieberman said, in a
statement.
In response to the California =
energy=20
crisis and the Enron scandal,
FERC last year announced the formation =
of the=20
Office of Market
Oversight and Investigations to scrutinize the =
electricity=20
and
natural gas markets as they moved from regulated monopolies=20
to
competitive markets.
But the GAO report said the OMOI still =
hasn't=20
defined its roles
and activities and has yet to develop many written=20
procedures
that would ensure its efforts are "coordinated,=20
systematic,
understood by its staff, and transparent to=20
stakeholders."
In a letter to the GAO, FERC Chairman Pat Wood=20
acknowledged
that FERC faces a "significant human capital challenge" =
and=20
still
lacks the ability to prevent another California type=20
crisis.
Under California's ill-conceived deregulation plan,=20
investor-owned
utilities sold most of their power plants and then =
bought most=20
of
their electricity from independent generators and other =
sellers.
But=20
while the prices were subject to fluctuations in supply and
demand, =
federal=20
law said prices had to be "just and reasonable" -
- a vague term that =
FERC,=20
the state and the sellers have spent
the past three years debating, =
the=20
Sacramento Bee reported in
September.
But Schwarzenegger is =
unmoved by=20
the GAO report. He still
believes that competition will bring lower=20
electricity prices to
consumers in California.
Schwarzenegger =
said he=20
will fire dozens of energy advisors
appointed by Davis to various =
posts in=20
favor of his own energy
team, one that "respects free-market=20
economics."
Schwarzenegger will also dismantle the California=20
Consumer
Power and Conservation Financing Authority, the public=20
power
agency created by the state Senate in August 2001 that=20
financed
small publicly owned power plants in California to eliminate =
the
possibility of future energy shortages.
Schwarzenegger =
explained=20
on his website,
http://www.joinarnold.com that =
the goal of=20
the Power Authority
"to build and operate publicly owned power plants =
is in=20
direct
competition with private industry and serves only to =
divert
private=20
investment in electricity generation and transmission
away from the=20
state."
Moreover, many of the state=92s other 13 energy agencies, =
such=20
as
the Electricity Oversight Board, a watchdog agency that =
monitors
the=20
performance of the California Independent System Operator,
the agency =
that=20
balances California=92s electricity supply and
demand, may also soon =
be out of=20
business, aides to
Schwarzenegger said.
One of =
Schwarzenegger=92s=20
boldest moves, however, will be to
enter into quick settlements with =
about a=20
dozen energy
companies accused of manipulating the state=92s =
electricity=20
market
during the height of the state=92s energy crisis two years =
ago,=20
aides
to Schwarzenegger said Wednesday.
For three years, =
California=20
has been engaged in a costly legal
battle against dozens of energy =
companies=20
it said ripped off the
state by purposely withholding much-needed =
electricity=20
from
consumers, creating an artificial shortage while boosting=20
the
companies=92 profits.
Federal regulators ordered =
electricity refunds=20
for California
totalling about $3.3 billion, but Davis said the state =
deserves at
least $9 billion and "not a penny less."
Richard =
Katz, an=20
energy advisor to Davis, told the Sacramento
Bee last month that he =
thinks=20
the state will have to sue to
recover significantly more money; the =
state=20
already has refund
cases pending before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of =
Appeals.
"The governor has said he'll go to every court, every=20
venue,"
Katz said. Litigation "is the only process we have for=20
getting
justice for ratepayers."
But Schwarzeneggeer aides =
said the=20
lawsuits are deterring
energy companies from building power plants in =
California, which
could lead to another energy crisis in 2006, and =
the=20
legal
wrangling alone is costing the state millions of =
dollars.
"It=92s=20
time to settle and move on," a top aide to Schwarzenegger
said. "We =
don=92t=20
want to inherit litigation."
**********
-Jason Leopold =
spent two=20
years covering California's electricity crisis
and the
Enron =
bankruptcy=20
as bureau chief of Dow Jones Newswires. He is writing a
book about=20
California's electricity crisis.
Home Page |Headlines |Previous =
Story=20
|Next Story
Copyright (c) Scoop Media
http://ww=
w.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0310/S00087.htm =
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C38F36.785E0760--
From jafujii@uci.edu Sat Oct 11 05:05:09 2003
From: jafujii@uci.edu (Jim Fujii)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:05:09 -0700
Subject: [Ethnicstudies] Fw: The Racism Barrier - Answering William Safire
Message-ID: <000901c38fbd$495dc9a0$35bbc380@ucigyqexhlhmwv>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C38F72.305A8BF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
http://www.counterpunch.org/alam10032003.html
CounterPunch October 3 / 5, 2003
The Racism Barrier
Answering William Safire
By M. Junaid Alam
In the United States, the Palestinian narrative receives the same =
brutally
dismissive treatment meted out to the dispossessed natives whose moving
plight it strongly conveys. Concrete evidence is blocked and barred =
entrance
at the gates of serious social discourse much as Palestine's pregnant =
women
are stalled and forced to give birth dangerously at checkpoints; =
important
historical facts and statistics are swept aside like the lives of
stone-throwing youths shot dead by ruthless occupation soldiers; =
undeniable
facts on the ground are met with shameful silence by the mainstream =
media,
their mastery over the art of indifference evidenced by a lack of =
outrage
against the crushing realities imposed upon an increasingly desperate
Palestinian mass pressed under the Israeli boot.
No doubt complicity in colonialism requires such cowardice as a national
necessity: can a nation hand over its billions, its tanks, its fighter
aircraft - its foreign policy -- to a settler-state without also
relinquishing every basic and fundamental principle of human justice? =
The
last of these exports, of course, must be cloaked in the most deliberate
distortions and obfuscations, hidden and buried under layers of
disinformation and lies, so as to soothe the conscience of initial =
doubters
and stifle criticism evinced by those unimpressed with the farce playing =
out
before them.
One of the primary court jesters in this gruesome debacle is William =
Safire,
ardent Zionist, columnist for America's paper of record, and personal =
friend
of indicted war criminal and mass murderer Ariel Sharon -- who, =
naturally,
holds the position of Prime Minister of Israel. On October 1st, our =
eminent
columnist published a wonderfully deceptive and revealing piece titled, =
"The
Arafat Barrier". Mr. Safire justifies the creation of Israel's monstrous
twenty-foot high, barb-wire-adorned apartheid wall by invoking the =
specter
of Arafat as an all-pervasive demon whose evil influence can only be
exorcised by erecting a massive physical barrier. In less than two =
pages,
Mr. Safire manages to pack and compress so many lies and myths into his
argument one almost expects his salvos to explode straight out of an =
Israeli
tank barrel and into the body of whatever Palestinian standing in the =
way.
No such luck for our New York Times columnist. But "The Arafat Barrier" =
does
afford us on the pro-Palestinian Left the opportunity to expose and
illuminate the moral poverty of Israel and the core tenets of Zionism
itself. Any breakthroughs in the public debate about Israel can only =
emerge
if such leftists actively tear apart the casually presented lies by =
going on
the offensive.
Mr. Safire starts out with an impressive burst of fire: "By unleashing =
and
sustaining suicide bombers against Israeli civilians, Yasir Arafat =
outfoxed
himself: the Palestinian boss has given substance to the Israeli dream =
and
U.N. promise of 'defensible borders.'"
Immediately, Arafat is anointed as the chief scapegoat for the latest
manifestation of Israeli racism. Arafat, all-powerful and all-evil being
that he is, snaps his fingers, conjures up hordes of suicide-bombers, =
and
orders them into Israel. Imbued with magical powers, he not only summons
Palestinians into action single-handedly, but has actually forced Israel =
to
build a costly wall spanning miles. Arafat would be flattered − =
and
also, one might gather, confused: deity that he is, he can set Israeli
construction firms into motion but remains unable to escape the =
crumbling
walls of his own shelled-out compound, where Israel has imprisoned and
threatened to execute him for the past year. Surely, God works in =
mysterious
ways.
Mr. Safire, his racist frothing spilling out in his first few words,
conceives of Palestinians not as a living, breathing, human people, but =
as
mindless beasts controlled by a single leader, a leader beset by =
internal
divisions in his own party and trapped under penalty of Israeli
"liquidation." In our esteemed columnist's hallucinatory world, none of =
this
matters: Arafat is everything, everything is Arafat.
By making suicide-bombings the active agent for what is then inevitably
characterized as the Israeli "response", Mr. Safire also rips bombings =
from
their context, positing them as irrational and unprovoked attacks. This =
is a
deliberate reversal of the actual flow and volume of violence: a century =
of
Israeli expulsions, village-razing, expropriating, murdering, raping,
looting, tank-shelling, bulldozing, and air-bombing preceded this =
desperate
Palestinian response. It is a response which does not account for even =
25%
of overall casualties since 1987.
Suicide attacks inside Israel were never a part of the Palestinian =
strategy
until the 1990's, after the first Intifada, when Yitzakh Rabin ordered
Israeli soldiers in their confrontation with protestors to "break their
bones." Israel murdered hundreds of Palestinian civilians, mostly youth
armed with only stones and the dignified pride of a people defying
Ben-Gurion's prediction about them and their forefathers: "Their old =
will
die, and their young will forget." Many have died: none have forgotten.
After framing the violence in terms of the most desperate reaction of =
the
oppressed against their oppressors, Mr. Safire must have felt quite =
pleased
with himself when speaking of "the Israeli dream" of "defensible =
borders."
In truth, Israel abhors borders; its entire existence, including its =
very
creation, depended precisely upon swallowing up and aggrandizing =
Palestinian
land, every boundary a temporary vortex, a set of teeth arranged in a
voracious jaw set to devour more and more Palestinian land and property
while spitting out or chewing up its inhabitants. Indeed, how strange =
for
our court jester, striking a serious pose, to speak of "defensible =
borders"
about a nation founded by a group of white European settlers in the =
heart of
the Arab world.
Nothing has revealed this historical -- and ongoing -- reality of =
Israeli
ethnic cleansing more clearly than that nation's own group of 'new
historians', who have exposed Israel's past via declassified archives =
for
the past twenty years. The founder of Zionism, Theodore Herzl, writing =
in
Europe more than fifty years before Israel was created, raised the =
urgent
matter of "spirit[ing] the penniless [Palestinian] population across the
border" and "expropriat[ing] gently the private property on the state
assigned to us." As the blade of colonialism was sharpened by time this
"gentleness" gave way to the formulation of Vladmir Jabotinsky, Zionist
leader of the 1920's and admirer of Mussolini's fascism: "Zionist
colonization, even the most restricted, must either be terminated or =
carried
out in defiance of the will of the native population. This colonization =
can,
therefore, continue and develop under the protection of a force =
independent
of the local population -- an iron wall"
Others who followed expressed equally revealing comments: Ben-Gurion,
justifying the expulsion of Palestinians from 1947-1949, said, "I =
support
compulsory transfer. I don't see anything immoral in it;" Moshe Dayan
gloated in 1969 that "There is not one single place built in this =
country
that did not have a former Arab population;" a few months ago IDF Chief =
of
Staff Ya'alon described Palestinians as a "cancer" for Israel requiring
"chemotherapy." From 1880 to the present, Zionism has seen its control =
of
historical Palestine rise from 0% to 7% to 48% to 78% and now 100%. =
Israeli
historian Tom Segev summarizes, "'Disappearing' the Arabs lay at the =
heart
of the Zionist dream, and was also a necessary precondition of its
existence." In a word, the verdict is in, and Mr. Safire should take =
note:
Israel does not want "borders" unless they are marked in Arab blood.
Our columnist continues, "Two-fifths of the barrier against terrorist
infiltration is already built," and soon after he terms it "a protective
fence." At first glance one is inclined to rejoice: surely, a wall =
erected
between colonizer and colonized, a "protective" wall preventing =
"terrorist
infiltration", might have been constructed, in a moment of Israeli
generosity, to provide Palestinians some small respite from the
infiltration, usurpation, and annexation of their land, homes, olive =
groves,
and water resources by Israeli zealots. This would be a most welcome
development: accounts of our Israeli 'new historians' inform us Israeli
terrorism has resulted in the massacre of hundreds of Palestinians, the
displacement of almost a million more, destruction of a half-thousand
villages, and theft of truckloads of private property, jewelry, land =
deeds,
bank accounts, furniture -- in 1948 alone.
In the end one is left disappointed, for Israel's new wall is in fact
another one of its agents of violence in its vast array of overt and
subversive weapons, designed to destroy the Palestinians by isolating =
and
demoralizing them. As reported by the London Guardian on July 3, 2003, =
the
wall is an excuse to engage in the old Zionist pastime of land theft: =
"The
Israeli government has confiscated hundreds of acres of Palestinian land =
on
the West bank," the article begins, "this week." Not to worry: this will =
be
accompanied by another Israeli favorite -- destroying homes: "The first
phase of the road mapobliges Israel to stop demolishing Palestinian =
homes --
but yesterday an Israeli official accompanied by soldiersmark[ed] out =
the
confiscated land and hand[ed] out demolition orders." The military
administrator had an explanation for Guardian reporters ready at hand: =
"It's
a bit sensitive."
But hasn't the administrator read Mr. Safire's latest? -- the wall is =
made
to protect Israel's "vulnerable" cities. Whether these cities are built =
on
land occupied in 1948, or land occupied in 1967, or land occupied =
yesterday,
does not concern our columnist: even the settlements, "where 200,000 =
West
Bank Jews live," the good writer kindly notes, must not be left =
"exposed" to
evil Arafat. That the very existence of these settlements epitomizes the
total negation of Palestinian rights to land they have lived on for
centuries, and represents a violent thrust into Palestinian lives, does =
not
trouble Mr. Safire. Every settlement is but one spike on the deadly end =
of a
mace, for each one is accompanied by racist bypass roads which slice up
Palestinian villages and are accessible only to Jews, bringing with them
army checkpoints, blockades, and outposts, all instruments used to =
harass
and beat Palestinians on a daily basis, a phenomenon widely reported by
international and Israeli human rights groups as well as Jewish and
Christian activist groups on the ground who have been attacked by the
settlers themselves.
Yes, Mr. Safire, the settlements must be "exposed"-that is, seen for =
what
they are, colonial enclaves occupied by racists built on stolen land.
Our columnist nonetheless goes on. After explaining that he once =
"choppered"
into the settlement of Ariel with his good friend Sharon in tow, he =
hails
the illegal enclave as a "courageous town." Does Mr. Safire lack the
intelligence to see that there is actually very little that is =
courageous
about settlers, living a posh existence off of stolen land, often as
hooligans assisted by the army in their mission to ravage a basically
defenseless Palestinian people, burning their crops, poisoning their =
cattle,
and ransacking their stores? Once the inevitable rage on the Palestinian
side accumulates, it implodes: not in an army base or settlement, but, =
most
of the time, in a major Israeli city. What a deluxe, consequence-free
venture for the "courageous" settlers (and army)!
But of course, as our columnist reminds us, this is precisely why the =
wall
is being built: so that Palestinian anger at present injustices can be
further aggravated and pressurized by the separation wall enterprise =
before
unleashing itself, perhaps not in a suicide bombing (or perhaps so) but
through crude though increasingly improved grenade, rocket, and missile
launches. The specific means do not matter: No people who have endured =
this
much violence and suffering will lapse into complacent cooperation with
their own extermination because of any wall, no matter how high it =
reaches,
how many volts run through it, or how many moral eunuchs support it.
After reviewing some details concerning expenditures for the separation
fence, Mr. Safire goes on to restate one of the most oft-repeated lies =
of
the past decade: Arafat was "presented with almost all the West Bank" -
excluding our "courageous" Ariel settlement - refused this kind offer, =
and
"launched the second intifada." To lend this lie legitimacy, Mr. Safire
cites Dennis Ross. The problem of course is that Dennis Ross is a =
prostitute
of the pro-Israeli lobby; formerly propped up by the noxious American
Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC), he works as a consultant for =
a
pro-Israeli lobbying group and is a colleague of the American ayatollah
Daniel Pipes. Our 'friend of Sharon' might as well have invoked David =
Duke
to back up the integrity of the Aryan Nation.
Ross or no Ross, a more categorically absurd fairy-tale spin of events
concerning the Barak accord and the second Intifada is difficult to =
imagine.
Barak never offered to hand over all the West Bank to the Palestinians,
because Barak in fact never agreed to dismantle the settlements at all.
Indeed, he built more settlements on the West Bank (some forty) than =
Likud's
Netanyahu. Palestinians would have lacked real control and sovereignty,
their land reduced to disconnected ghettoes, broken up by Israeli
settlements and surrounded by the soldiers guarding them. A brief look =
at
any recent map of the Occupied Territories with the settlements shown
confirms this.
Moreover, Barak denied the Palestinians sovereignty over not only land =
but
water, since the settlers hold monopoly over water rights. He also =
announced
there would be no compensation, not to speak of actual implementation of =
the
UN-guaranteed right of return, for the millions of Palestinian refugees
created by Israeli ethnic cleansing over the years. A specialist working =
for
the British Foreign Office put it thusly: "Barak offered the trappings =
of
Palestinian sovereignty while perpetuating the subjugation of the
Palestinians." (Guardian, April 10, 2002) This is the substance of the
"offer": a prison cell with a sticker label.
As for Arafat "launching" the second Intifada, the truth turns out to be
quite different. The deliberately provocative visit of the Likud hawk =
Ariel
Sharon to a Muslim place of worship is what sparked the second Intifada.
Sharon, surrounded and escorted by hundreds of Israeli troops and at the
time best known for his murderous performance in the Lebanese refugee =
camps
in 1982 (before more recent murderous performances had to be taken into
account), marched into Islam's third holiest place on the day of Muslim
prayer. Even Israeli "liberals" termed it a "provocation." In the first =
few
weeks of the violence that followed, Israeli soldiers, described by =
former
New York Times reporter Chris Hedges as the only troops he has seen who
killed children "for sport", murdered hundreds of Palestinian civilians,
most of them teenagers. In the same period there was only a dozen or so
Israeli dead.
Mr. Safire has completely inverted the truth on two major counts in the
course of one sentence. Does Mr. Safire borrow his method from Mr. =
Goebbels?
Perhaps; what is quite clear is that he borrows his ideology from Mr.
Jabotinsky & co.: explaining the need for Israel to hold off =
construction
for one part of the wall for now, he gleefully adds: "That does not mean =
to
abandon Ariel; far from it.fencing can encircle each of the villages,
defending them as islands, or perhaps a horseshoe-shaped barrier not
attached to the main line with Israeli troops stationed in the gap." Our
columnist sketches out, in military language, to what great lengths =
Israel
must go to secure its colonists, positioned like artillery, supported by
walls, flanked by troops.
Is this any way to live as garrisoned "islands"? Yet this is supposed =
to be
the Zionist dream: an existence which, dependent on separation and
exclusivism, removes the Palestinians and "redeems" the land for the =
Jews.
Yet, politically, financially, and demographically, it is so absurd and
fantastic that Mr. Safire must play the role of General to achieve it.
This is no small matter: It was Jabotinsky, after all, who penned the =
essay
The Iron Wall and once wrote, "Zionism is a colonizing adventure and,
therefore, it stands or falls on the question of armed forces." He and =
other
Zionists, however, posing their solution to what Jewish scholar Norman
Finkelstein has described as "the reciprocal challenges of Gentile =
repulsion
or anti-Semitism and Gentile assimilation" facing European Jewry, =
adopted
the position that Jews will constantly be harried and disrupted in =
Gentile
society because of their efforts to assimilate, and will find refuge =
only in
their own homogenous state. Has not the opposite occurred?
Consider the following: In his revealing book The Seventh Million: The
Israelis and the Holocaust Israeli scholar Tom Segev notes, "The
Revisionists" - the wing of Zionism Jabotinsky belonged to -"had fairly
wide-ranging links to the Nazis," adding that their leadership =
"distributed
a memorandum to its members" advising that "The Nazis should be treated
politely and with reserve." (p. 32) By 1928, Segev adds, "The =
revisionist
righthad long been sympathetic to Benito Mussolini and now and then even =
to
Adolf Hitler's Nazism-except, of course, his anti-Semitism," and quotes =
a
1932 Revisionist lawyer as saying "Were it not for Hitler's =
anti-Semitism,
we would not oppose his ideology." (p. 20, 23) Such was the level of =
faith
placed in European racist philosophy by Zionism (how different were =
Goebbels
and Jabotinsky?). Even Ben-Gurion, who was repulsed by Jabotinsky as =
Segev
notes, declared "If I knew that it was possible to save all the children =
in
Germany by transporting them to England, but only half of them by
transporting them to Palestine, I would choose the second" (p.24)
Zionist leaders invested so much in their racialist approach that they =
acted
at the expense of other Jews. To cite Segev's book one last time, the =
author
quotes 1925 Zionist Jacob Klatzkin, author of Encyclopaedia Judaica, who
wrote, "If we do not admit the rightfulness of anti-Semitism, we deny =
the
rightfulness of our own nationalism." (p.30) In practice this meant the
Zionist attitude toward the Holocaust left much to be desired from the
humanist point of view. Yet precisely where Jews have separated =
themselves,
discriminated against and pushed apart the racial Other (Arabs), life =
has
been most difficult; where they exist as equals and partners in
multicultural societies, such as America and Britain, and now even =
Germany,
they are thriving, with anti-Semitism no more (or in some cases less)
prevalent than other forms of racism against other minority groups.
Therefore the core tenet of Zionist philosophy, that anti-Semitism is a
natural and inevitable Gentile impulse, has now been discredited by =
reality
and shamed by history.
So whereas mindless pro-Israel fanatics like Mr. Safire cling to their
precious settlements and all the madness that comes with them, others =
have
become wiser: Avraham Burg, former speaker of Israel's Knesset and =
former
chairman of the Jewish Agency, has written an article which, given the
stature of the author, is worth quoting at length:=20
"The Israeli nation today rests on a scaffolding of corruption, and on
foundations of oppression and injusticeIt turns out that the 2,000-year
struggle for Jewish survival comes down to a state of settlements, run =
by an
amoral clique of corrupt lawbreakers who are deaf both to their citizens =
and
to their enemies. A state lacking justice cannot survive. More and more
Israelis are coming to understand this as they ask their children where =
they
expect to live in 25 years. Children who are honest admit, to their =
parents'
shock, that they do not know. The countdown to the end of Israeli =
society
has begunA structure built on human callousness will inevitably collapse =
in
on itself." (Guardian, September 15, 2003 [adopted from original =
publication
in Hebrew in Israeli paper Yediot Arahnot])
Returning to our op-ed piece, Mr. Safire is doubly pleased with himself =
for
having not only spelled out the details of increasing Israel's neurosis =
but
also showing that such a maneuver would illustrate that "Israel respects
America's intercession" and that "only Bush not the Europeans or U.N. =
can
influence Sharon." The swipe at the rest of the world is understandable
enough: aside from the U.S, everyone else is, of course, "anti-Semitic." =
But
the first part is truly comical: whatever inkling of impartiality =
maintained
by the Bush administration that has not been crushed, intimidated, and
bullied into irrelevance by Israeli lobbying and browbeating has been
ignored by Sharon anyway, save killing Arafat. Whether or not the White
House withholds a few meager millions to "punish" continued Israeli
construction of the wall is meaningless given the cover of UN vetoes,
military hardware, and billions in loans and investment it has showered =
upon
Israel. In short, there has been no "intercession": when Israel sticks =
the
six-inch serrated blade into Palestine that Mr. Safire calls "the Arafat
Barrier" America will not be absolved because it did not pay for the =
last
few centimeters.
After making some noises about "extend[ing] the fence to defensible =
[sic]
positions," Mr. Safire makes a nod to the introduction of his piece with =
an
equally dishonest and disgusting ending: "That gives future Israeli
governments opportunity to improve territorial defenses if a Palestinian
partner does not emerge. When that peacemaker does emerge, he or she =
will
find the defensible-border issue already settled thanks to Yasir =
Arafat."
In other words, Israel will do as it pleases, pushing the Palestinians =
into
a more and more hopeless predicament, such that a puppet leader of our
choosing will be forced to bow and kneel before the new territorial =
reality
created by irreversible Israeli colonization.
The final and oft-repeated canard concerning the lack of "a Palestinian
partner" for peace is also a nice ending touch, and, in fact, the one =
part
of Mr. Safire's article with which I agree entirely. Indeed, no nation =
has
worked as hard to find a peace partner than Israel, which has been =
searching
so meticulously and methodically that it has occupied the entire =
Palestinian
nation to find this treasured partner. Israel's advanced search party of
F-16 aircraft and Merkava IV tanks has scoured the land; its bulldozers
overturned houses; its torturers beaten children; its security services
corralled thousands of men; to find and dig out this reluctant =
Palestinian
messiah.
But a willing accomplice to Israel's genocidal agenda with even an iota =
of
support from the Palestinian masses will never be found. Mr. Safire can
continue with his paper columns, Mr. Sharon with his tank columns and =
Israel
with its barriers, bullets, bombs, and bulldozers: it will not matter in =
the
end. Every injustice, every atrocity, has and will only continue to =
sharpen
and strengthen the indomitable Palestinian will to resist against all =
odds.=20
M. Junaid Alam is a political science student at Northeastern =
University. He
designed and manages the http://msalam.net/ website. He can be reached =
at:
junaidalam@msalam.net
------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C38F72.305A8BF0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable