California budget includes broader insurer tax to boost Medi-Cal funding

CAL/AAEM News Service calaaem.news.service1 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 2 11:18:51 PST 2016


       

 

January 8, 2016

 

California budget includes broader insurer tax to boost Medi-Cal funding

 

 

 
<http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160108/NEWS/160109893?utm_source=
modernhealthcare&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20160108-NEWS-160109893&utm_ca
mpaign=financedaily> Modern Healthcare

 

 

The California health plans that would pay higher taxes on their
managed-care plans to bolster funding for the state's Medicaid program are
still "crunching the numbers" on the controversial tax that was included in
Gov. Jerry Brown's budget released Thursday.

 

The broader managed-care organization (MCO) tax would replace a narrower
levy set to expire at the end of June. It only hit plans that participate in
the state's Medicaid managed-care program, better known as Medi-Cal.

 

Less than half of health plans in the state operate Medicaid MCOs. The
dozens of plans that don't tend to be smaller players. The proposed tax rate
would be tiered based on enrollment.

 

Of the 47 insurers that are members of the California Association of Health
Plans, only 22 are currently participating in the Medicaid managed-care
program.

 

"Filling the $1.1 billion hole in the Medi-Cal budget remains a priority for
health plans and we are analyzing and crunching the numbers on the latest
proposal," said Charles Bacchi, CEO of the California Association of Health
Plans.

 

The three-year tax reform package is the culmination of months of
negotiations between the governor and the health insurance industry. Brown
said insurers would see an estimated $90 million net benefit from the
compromise package.

 

Those benefits would mostly go to Medi-Cal carriers, which see it as a way
to share responsibility for the program with the rest of the industry. The
tax is needed to fill the $1.1 billion gap in the state's $34 billion health
and human services budget, most of which goes to Medi-Cal. Proceeds will be
matched with federal dollars and returned to health plans in the form of
higher Medi-Cal rates.

 

The government's $122.6 billion budget now moves to the state Legislature,
where it will require bipartisan support to muster the two-thirds majority
needed to pass the bill.

 

Providers in the state remain dissatisfied with the compromise. The
California Hospital Association criticized the budget for failing to restore
rate reductions that went into effect in 2011 and cut most services up to
10%. Medi-Cal rates are among the lowest in the country.

 

The CHA is also fighting the state's effort to claw back payments made to
hospital-based skilled-nursing facilities, which were hit with retroactive
rate reductions under the earlier budget cuts.

 

Other provisions of the 2016-17 budget included extending Medi-Cal benefits
to undocumented immigrant children under the age of 19 as of May 1. That
move is widely supported across the state's healthcare industry.

 

Consumer advocates-while generally happy with the budget provisions-held
rallies in five cities Friday to call for greater funding for health and
human services programs. The state expects to post a nearly $8 billion
surplus in the fiscal year that ends in June.

 

"The surplus was created in part from $15 billion in (state Health and Human
Service Agency) cuts; it's high time to restore cuts to Medi-Cal benefits
and rates and other public health programs," said Anthony Wright, executive
director of Health Access California, the consumer advocacy coalition that
organized the rallies.

 

The governor pleased advocates by recommending continuance of the state's
effort to coordinate care for people eligible for both Medicare and
Medicaid.

 

Twelve states have rolled out three-year demonstrations under the Affordable
Care Act to improve coordination of health benefits for poor seniors
eligible for both programs; without coordination, care can be frequently
splintered and high-cost for both the federal and state governments.

 

Many have been struggling to achieve cost-savings goals because beneficiary
participation is optional and most are deciding to opt out. As many as 50%
of those eligible to participate in California's demonstration left the
program, according to Mari Cantwell, director of California's Medi-Cal
program.

 

"The two major reasons for the opt-out are a general fear and concern about
changes in healthcare. We've also struggled with some coordinated efforts by
different types of providers . who have been concerned about rates,"
Cantwell said in a webinar last year.

 

Brown had flagged the demonstration in his annual budget proposal last year
as costing the state money. He threatened to pull the pull the plug once it
runs its course at the start of 2017 unless he saw signs of improvement.

 

In the days leading up to the release of his budget proposal, stakeholders
expressed distress about the program ending.

 

"My concern is should California end the program that it would be signal the
dual demonstrations are a failure," said Jeff Myers, president of Medicaid
Health Plans of America. He believes that the coordinated approach under
these demonstrations is the best way to ensure these beneficiaries get the
care they need.

 

On Thursday, Brown revealed a change of heart by offering to continue the
demonstration until at least Jan. 1, 2018. 

 

 

 

Jeff Wells
Deputy Editor, CAL/AAEM News Service

 

Brian Potts MD, MBA
Managing Editor, CAL/AAEM News Service

Contact us at:  <mailto:calaaem.news.service1 at gmail.com>
calaaem.news.service1 at gmail.com

For more articles, visit our  <http://www.calaaem.org/news_archives.php>
archives. 

 <mailto:somcaaem at uci.edu> To
<https://maillists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/calaaem>  unsubscribe from this
list, visit our mail server.

Copyright (C) 2015. The California Chapter of the American Academy of
Emergency Medicine (CAL/AAEM).  <http://www.calaaem.org>
http://www.calaaem.org. All rights reserved.

CAL/AAEM, a nonprofit professional organization for emergency physicians,
operates the CAL/AAEM News Service solely as an educational resource for
physicians. Dissemination of an article by CAL/AAEM News Service does not
imply endorsement, agreement, or recommendation by CAL/AAEM News Service,
CAL/AAEM, or AAEM.

Follow CAL/AAEM on Facebook and Twitter:

 

 <http://www.facebook.com/pages/CalAAEM/172577489479442?sk=wall&filter=12>
<https://twitter.com/#!/CALAAEM>
<http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem> 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20160202/4dae929d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 24675 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20160202/4dae929d/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 877 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20160202/4dae929d/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20160202/4dae929d/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20160202/4dae929d/attachment-0007.jpg>


More information about the CALAAEM mailing list