Court Upholds Injunction Against Medi-Cal Reimbursement Cuts

CAL/AAEM News Service somcaaem at hs.uci.edu
Mon Jul 13 21:25:52 PDT 2009


[http://www.aaem.org/emails/images/calaaem_header.gif]
July 10, 2009
Court Upholds Injunction Against Medi-Cal Reimbursement Cuts
The California Healthline<http://www.californiahealthline.org/Articles/2009/7/10/Court-Upholds-Injunction-Against-MediCal-Reimbursement-Cuts.aspx>
On Thursday, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that California violated federal law last year by reducing Medi-Cal reimbursements by 10% for physicians, pharmacists and other health care providers, the San Francisco Chronicle reports.
Medi-Cal is California's Medicaid program (Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle, 7/10).
Background
Last year, the Legislature approved a 10% Medi-Cal rate reduction in an effort to balance the state's budget (Williams, Los Angeles Times, 7/10).
State officials estimated that the move would lower state spending by $500 million (AP/Sacramento Bee, 7/9).
After the Medi-Cal cuts took effect on July 1, 2008, a group of health care providers sued the Department of Health Care Services, saying that lower reimbursement rates negatively affect beneficiaries' access to care (Los Angeles Times, 7/10).
On Aug. 18, 2008, U.S. District Judge Christina Snyder ordered an injunction halting the rate reductions. Snyder did not order the state to issue retroactive payments dating back to when the cuts took effect.
Details of Ruling
In Thursday's 3-0 decision, the court ruled that California violated a federal statute, which requires states that receive Medicaid funds to set reimbursement rates at levels that allow for equal access to health care.
The federal government funds 50% of the state's Medicaid program.
The court said the state implemented the cuts for financial reasons and did not sufficiently study how the 10% reductions would affect Medi-Cal beneficiaries' access to care.
The ruling also broadens Snyder's earlier injunction by requiring the state to retroactively reimburse physicians, pharmacists and other health providers by the amount cut from their fees on July 1, 2008 (San Francisco Chronicle, 7/10).
State Budget Implications
H.D. Palmer, deputy director of the Department of Finance, said California will have to pay $55.8 million to cover the withheld payments.
Palmer said that the ruling should not affect the state's $26.3 billion budget deficit because officials had not accounted for savings from the Medi-Cal cuts (Los Angeles Times, 7/10).
However, the ruling could hinder budget plans put forth by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) and state legislators, who have proposed further Medi-Cal cuts for this fiscal year (San Francisco Chronicle, 7/10).
Abid Mogannam &
Brian Potts MD, MBA
Managing Editors, CAL/AAEM News Service
University of California, Irvine
Contact us at: somcaaem at uci.edu<mailto:somcaaem at uci.edu>

For more articles, visit our archives<http://maillists.uci.edu/mailman/public/calaaem/>.

To<mailto:somcaaem at uci.edu> unsubscribe<https://maillists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/calaaem> from this list, visit our mail server.

Copyright (C) 2008 The California Chapter of the American Academy of Emergency Physicians All rights reserved.

CAL/AAEM, a nonprofit professional organization for emergency physicians, operates the CAL/AAEM News Service solely as an educational resource for physicians. Dissemination of an article by CAL/AAEM News Service does not imply endorsement, agreement, or recommendation by CAL/AAEM News Service, CAL/AAEM, or AAEM.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://maillists.uci.edu/mailman/public/calaaem/attachments/20090713/abfae076/attachment.html 


More information about the CALAAEM mailing list