Physicians Decry Broken Promise of Medicare Raise in 2016

CAL/AAEM News Service calaaem.news.service1 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 19 17:44:23 PST 2015


       

 

November 3, 2015

 

Physicians Decry Broken Promise of Medicare Raise in 2016

 

 

 <http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/853878?src=wnl_edit_tpal> Medscape

 

 

By Robert Lowes

 

The law that repealed Medicare's sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula for
physician pay called for an annual raise of 0.5% from 2016 through 2019 as
part of a transition to value-based reimbursement.

 

When Congress passed the law in April, some leaders of organized medicine
noted that the modest raise lagged behind the inflation rate, but said it
was better than nothing. It was certainly better than the disastrous 21% pay
cut that the SGR formula would have triggered in 2016. Medical societies
sold their membership on the legislation, called the Medicare Access and
CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), in part by saying it would stabilize
Medicare rates for several years.

 

However, the promised raise of 0.5% turned into a 0.3% pay cut in the fine
print of the final 2016 Medicare fee schedule
<http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/853878> released last week. The reason?
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) and several other laws that set Medicare
reimbursement policy trumped MACRA.

 

Organized medicine isn't taking it too well.

 

"Physicians were told that they would get an increase, and they're not,"
said Wanda Filer, MD, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians
(AAFP). "It's a morale breaker."

 

In its 2016 fee schedule, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS) walked through the math that produced the tiny pay cut in 2016. It
involves the fee schedule conversion factor, a dollar amount that gets
multiplied by the relative value units (RVUs) assigned to thousands of
physician services. A mid-level office visit (CPT billing code 99213) with
an established patient, for example, is worth 2.04 RVUs. The current
conversion factor is roughly $35.93. Multiplying 2.04 by that amount yields
a national payment amount of $73.30.

 

MACRA duly increases that conversion factor by 0.5%. However, CMS math also
lowers the conversion factor by 0.02% to reflect a RVU "budget neutrality
adjustment," a routine bookkeeping exercise. That adjustment alone would not
have wiped out the MACRA increase and then some. The real culprit was an
additional 0.77% decrease that CMS introduced because it did not meet a
certain cost-savings target.

 

That savings target originated with the ACA, which requires CMS to
periodically identify and adjust RVUs for physician services that are
underpaid or overpaid, with an emphasis on overpaid. These misvalued
services, or misvalued codes as they're often called, typically arise when
advances in medical technology shorten the time and expense needed to
perform a service while the payment rate remains the same.

 

This ACA provision was the prelude to a law called the Protecting Access to
Medicare Act (PAMA) of 2014, which told CMS to fix enough misvalued services
to reduce Medicare fee-for-service spending on physician services by 0.5%
each year from 2017 to 2020. On the heels of PAMA, the Achieve a Better Life
Experience (ABLE) Act of 2014 moved the start date up to 2016, and increased
the savings target to 1.0% for that year.

 

CMS managed to only correct enough misvalued codes for a savings of 0.23%,
according to the 2016 fee schedule. Because it fell short of the 1% mark,
the agency said, it is obliged under PAMA to reduce total fee-for-service
spending on physicians by 0.77% to make up the difference.

 

The two reductions cancelled the MACRA increase and yielded a conversion
factor of roughly $35.83 in 2016, 0.3% less than in 2015.

 

Calculation of the CY 2016 Physician Fee Schedule Conversion Factor


Conversion factor in effect in CY 2015

35.9335


Update factor

0.5% (1.005)


CY 2016 RVU budget neutrality adjustment

-0.02% (0.9998)


CY 2016 target recapture amount

-0.77% (0.9923)


CY 2016 conversion factor

35.8279

Source: CMS

 

Bound by "Current Law"

 

Organized medicine saw the stealth pay cut coming in the 2016 fee schedule
when it was released in draft form last summer for public comment. At that
time, CMS said that its misvalued codes initiative had reduced
fee-for-service spending by roughly 0.25%. In response, medical societies
such as the AAFP, the American College of Physicians, and the American
Medical Association, as well as the Medical Group Management Association
(MGMA), urged CMS to tweak its methodology for essentially repricing codes
and calculating the savings so it could hit the 1% target and avoid
canceling the MACRA raise. MGMA called the agency's approach "narrow." The
association recommended, among other things, that CMS base its calculations
on a broader group of repriced codes than what the agency used.

 

In the final fee schedule issued last week, CMS stood its ground. "We
continue to believe this approach is appropriate and compliant with
statutory directives," it said. The agency repeatedly stated that it was
bound by "current law" - in other words, MACRA, the ACA, PAMA, and ABLE.

 

Halee Fischer-Wright, MD, the president and CEO of MGMA, said her group is
"extremely disappointed that CMS failed to meet the [1%] target set by
Congress."

 

"Instead, CMS's inaction will result in an across-the-board cut to
physicians in 2016," Dr. Fischer-Wright said in a statement given to
Medscape Medical News. "For all the ambitious plans touted by the agency to
move Medicare toward a value-based payment system for physicians, its
inability to adequately review misvalued codes under current fee-for-service
calls into question how CMS will be able to implement far more sophisticated
payment models in the future."

 

Primary care physicians will feel the 0.3% Medicare rate cut more keenly
than their specialist peers, said AAFP president Dr. Filer.

 

"I think primary care physicians are working a minimum margin and working
frequently at a deficit," she said. "Practice costs haven't declined, and
primary care has been undervalued for a very long time.

 

"Any cut is a financial hit."

 

The comments from Dr Filer and Dr Fischer-Wright stand in contrast to what
the White House says about MACRA on its website: "At last, the doctors who
care for seniors and many Americans with disabilities will no longer have to
worry that about the possibility of an arbitrary cut in their pay."

 

CMS did not respond to a request for a comment on next year's Medicare pay
cut.

 

 

 

Jeff Wells
Deputy Editor, CAL/AAEM News Service

 

Brian Potts MD, MBA
Managing Editor, CAL/AAEM News Service

Contact us at:  <mailto:calaaem.news.service1 at gmail.com>
calaaem.news.service1 at gmail.com

For more articles, visit our  <http://www.calaaem.org/news_archives.php>
archives. 

 <mailto:somcaaem at uci.edu> To
<https://maillists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/calaaem>  unsubscribe from this
list, visit our mail server.

Copyright (C) 2015. The California Chapter of the American Academy of
Emergency Medicine (CAL/AAEM).  <http://www.calaaem.org>
http://www.calaaem.org. All rights reserved.

CAL/AAEM, a nonprofit professional organization for emergency physicians,
operates the CAL/AAEM News Service solely as an educational resource for
physicians. Dissemination of an article by CAL/AAEM News Service does not
imply endorsement, agreement, or recommendation by CAL/AAEM News Service,
CAL/AAEM, or AAEM.

Follow CAL/AAEM on Facebook and Twitter:

 

 <http://www.facebook.com/pages/CalAAEM/172577489479442?sk=wall&filter=12>
<https://twitter.com/#!/CALAAEM>
<http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem> 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20151119/cfe74281/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 24675 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20151119/cfe74281/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 877 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20151119/cfe74281/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20151119/cfe74281/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20151119/cfe74281/attachment-0007.jpg>


More information about the CALAAEM mailing list