Providers fear insurance mergers will intensify rate pressures

Sun Jul 12 12:41:26 PDT 2015

June 27, 2015

Providers fear insurance mergers will intensify rate pressures

<http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20150627/MAGAZINE/306279934?utm_sou
rce=modernhealthcare&utm_medium=email&utm_content=externalURL&utm_campaign=f
inancedaily> Modern Healthcare

By Bob Herman

Dr. Robert Wergin practices family medicine in Milford, Neb., population
2,000. His office interacts with many different health insurers. But three
carriers-Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska, Aetna subsidiary Coventry
Health Care and UnitedHealthcare-are the dominant private payers in his
area. That number could shrink even more.

The health insurance industry is on the verge of large-scale consolidation
as its leaders seek to drive down costs, increase negotiating leverage and
boost profits. Anthem has gone public with its takeover offer for Cigna
Corp., valuing the deal at $54 billion. Aetna is reportedly on the brink of
acquiring Humana, while UnitedHealth Group is considering a complex buyout
of Aetna. In addition, Wall Street views the smaller publicly traded
insurers, such as Centene Corp., Molina Healthcare and WellCare Health
Plans, as ripe targets for a second round of deal-making. 

Insurance consolidation could, in turn, spur more consolidation among
providers to counter the greater bargaining power of a smaller number of big
insurers. And independent providers are wary about that. "If providers
merge, then insurers have to merge, and if insurers merge, then providers
have to merge," said Erik Gordon, a business professor at the University of
Michigan. "It's a cyclical arms race, until antitrust steps in and says
that's enough."

The merger tremors worry Wergin, president of the American Academy of Family
Physicians. Consumers' choice of health plans would shrink, and insurers'
cost savings would not guarantee lower premiums for employers and consumers
or broader provider networks, he said.

The AAFP wrote a letter this month to the Federal Trade Commission warning
that letting health insurers morph into leviathans would result in
"increased leverage and unfair power over negotiating rates with hospitals
and physicians." Deals would especially affect smaller physician practice
groups like Wergin's.

"When you're rural or a small practice, your leverage is limited," Wergin
said. "If you take small practices like mine and squeeze me hard, you might
be closing my doors."

Insurance mergers have been building for years, spurred by the Affordable
Care Act, which puts pressure on healthcare organizations to cut costs,
improve care and strengthen care coordination. Provider organizations and
insurers have seen that as a green light to combine and build economies of
scale into their respective sectors.

Stand-alone hospitals and physician groups in crowded markets already have
limited negotiating leverage with insurers, and often find themselves in a
take-it-or-leave-it situation. That has led many physician groups to refuse
to sign contracts, increasing the risk of patients getting stuck with large
out-of-network medical bills. Wergin said his practice and his town's
critical-access hospital have not signed network agreements with
UnitedHealthcare because the insurer demands discounts that are "too deep."
Providers and policy experts worry insurance mergers will intensify these
pressures.

"That's going to be a concern for the entire provider community," said
Steven Sonenreich, CEO of Mount Sinai Medical Center, a 608-bed independent
teaching hospital in Miami Beach, Fla. "Unquestionably for stand-alone
institutions, it's an even greater challenge."

The first domino to fall in the insurance merger game appears to be Anthem
and Cigna. Anthem offered to pay $184 per share for Cigna. In assuming
Cigna's debt, the price tag would be about $54 billion, potentially the
largest deal in health insurance history.

Anthem believes that $2 billion in costs can be cut from the merged company
within two years. But Doug Sherlock, a veteran healthcare analyst at
Sherlock Co., said only 15% to 20% of administrative expenses are subject to
economies of scale in most mergers, making it important to not overstate
potential savings.

Analysts predict Cigna ultimately will say yes. Cigna CEO David Cordani
wants to head the new combined company, but Anthem has spurned that demand.

Instead, Anthem CEO Joseph Swedish would remain as chief and become the
company's chairman and head of integration. Cordani, who would be owed
almost $10 million in cash severance and tens of millions of dollars in
unvested stock awards if Cigna is taken over, would become president and
chief operating officer.

Cigna also has aired other concerns, such as approval from the Blue Cross
and Blue Shield Association, which provides Blues licensing to Anthem, as
well as pending antitrust litigation against the association. The
Association limits how much of a licensee's business can be branded outside
of the Blues and how the company can compete with other Blues plans.
Lawsuits against the association allege that Blues plans collude to create
monopolies in different healthcare markets.

But Anthem's Swedish said last week that "we have provided a clear,
comprehensive and compelling offer. We just felt that the process was not
developing in a way that we felt would be coming to an end that best
represented the interests of the shareholders.

Anthem and Cigna overlap in some markets. A combined entity would have about
1.1 million Medicare Advantage members, keeping Anthem as the fifth-largest
Advantage insurer. But most of the scrutiny would come in the commercial
market. In New Hampshire, for example, Anthem and Cigna control 67% of the
large-group insurance market, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.
That would give them powerful leverage over area providers in rate
negotiations.

While those areas of overlap may prompt scrutiny from the Justice
Department's antitrust division, it wouldn't necessarily derail these deals.
The merged companies could agree to make divestitures in markets where
competition would be reduced. The Justice Department uses a measure called
the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index to determine the competitive landscape of
individual markets. "It's not a question of absolute size," Gordon said.
"It's a question of alternatives in the market."

Not all hospitals would necessarily come under the thumb of bulked-up
insurers. Dominant regional and national health systems still hold
considerable negotiating power in certain markets. Ana Gupte, a managing
director at Leerink Partners, said for-profit hospital chains such as
Nashville-based HCA are watching insurance consolidation moves closely. But
they "remain confident that their own local market strength remains decent
in all potential scenarios," she said.

"The reality is healthcare markets are local," said Matthew Cantor, a
partner at antitrust law firm Constantine Cannon. "What's going to make a
difference is whether the insurer would have a large percentage of customers
in a certain locality."

Cantor argues that insurers would have had a stronger case for consolidation
with the government's antitrust enforcers if the Supreme Court had thrown
out the ACA's premium subsidies last week. Without subsidies, the individual
market would have been severely disrupted. "It's going to be much harder to
make that argument now because there's a lot of opportunity for organic
growth out there," he said.

With the likelihood of big insurance mergers growing, many observers remain
skeptical about their broader societal benefits, citing the lack of evidence
that mergers in other industries have helped consumers. "I'm trying to think
of an example of where consolidation has driven down costs and improved
service," Sonenreich said. "I know I'm paying more for my cable bill, and I
know I'm paying more for my airplane tickets."

Jeff Wells
Deputy Editor, CAL/AAEM News Service

Brian Potts MD, MBA
Managing Editor, CAL/AAEM News Service

Contact us at:  <mailto:calaaem.news.service1 at gmail.com>
calaaem.news.service1 at gmail.com

For more articles, visit our  <http://www.calaaem.org/news_archives.php>
archives. 

 <mailto:somcaaem at uci.edu> To
<https://maillists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/calaaem>  unsubscribe from this
list, visit our mail server.

CAL/AAEM, a nonprofit professional organization for emergency physicians,
operates the CAL/AAEM News Service solely as an educational resource for
physicians. Dissemination of an article by CAL/AAEM News Service does not
imply endorsement, agreement, or recommendation by CAL/AAEM News Service,
CAL/AAEM, or AAEM.

Follow CAL/AAEM on Facebook and Twitter:

 <http://www.facebook.com/pages/CalAAEM/172577489479442?sk=wall&filter=12>
<https://twitter.com/#!/CALAAEM>
<http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20150712/1bcf8c58/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 24675 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20150712/1bcf8c58/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 877 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20150712/1bcf8c58/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20150712/1bcf8c58/attachment-0006.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillists.uci.edu/pipermail/calaaem/attachments/20150712/1bcf8c58/attachment-0007.jpg>